Lauri Love takes legal action against NCA for return of seized computers

Lauri Love takes legal action against NCA for return of seized computers

Lauri Love takes legal action against NCA for return of seized computers

Lauri Love, the 34-year-old laptop activist who faces a UK police investigation into allegations that he hacked into US executive computers, seemed in courtroom as of late arguing for the return of laptop apparatus seized through the National Crime Agency (NCA).

The NCA has showed that it’s operating with US prosecutors to deliver fees against Love five-and-a-half years after he used to be arrested in a raid on his folks’ house in Stradishall, Suffolk.

Love’s legal action comes just about a 12 months after the Court of Appeal quashed a US extradition request against Love, having heard proof that he would now not be correctly cared for in america jail device and could be at top possibility of suicide. The courtroom advised the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to start out a prosecution in the United Kingdom.

Love is the usage of the Police Property Act 1897 to deliver legal action against the National Crime Agency to recuperate his laptop apparatus and the information contained on its arduous power.

Representing himself at a listening to at Hendon Magistrates’ Court, London, Love requested the courtroom to make use of its discretion to return a Fujitsu Siemens computer, an Acer Computer Tower and a Compaq laptop tower, in conjunction with an SD card and tough drives.

In written submissions, licensed for disclosure through the pass judgement on, Love mentioned it used to be transparent he had no related legal file, nor historical past of offending, and had undertaken no movements to signify he would dedicate legal offences.

He argued that says through the NCA that the alleged encrypted contents of his laptop apparatus would permit or facilitate the fee of offences used to be totally “hypothetical”.

Love mentioned in written submissions that the NCA would “undoubtedly have made multiple forensic copies” of the information and had, on a couple of events, introduced to return his assets after “wiping” its contents, so it used to be transparent reproduction would suffice for any police investigation.

At an previous listening to at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 18 December 2018, Love mentioned there used to be no proof that his computers contained encrypted knowledge and that below the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, the police had an obligation to return his assets.

Andrew Bird, representing the NCA, mentioned throughout the December listening to that Love’s laptop apparatus, which used to be seized through police in 2013, contained data together with “the addresses of cops subscribed to the Police Oracle and big quantities of data from america Department of Energy”.

Hendon Magistrates’ Court imposed restrictions against reporting information and proof disclosed throughout as of late’s listening to at the grounds that it’s going to prejudice a long run legal case against Love if he used to be prosecuted through the National Crime Agency.

“The use of strong information security should not be a reason to deprive people of their personal data”
Lauri Love

District pass judgement on Margot Coleman advised the courtroom that it used to be the default place below the Criminal Procedural Rules that the case must be heard in a closed listening to. She dominated that the courtroom continue in open courtroom, however imposed reporting restrictions on proof disclosed in courtroom.

“Mr Love had extradition proceedings, which resulted in him not being extradited to the US. One was on forum [bar] grounds, one was on medical health. No decision has yet been taken whether proceedings will take place in this country. It is for that reason, because of ongoing trial, that I am not prepared to allow evidence to be reported in future because it might compromise a future trial,” pass judgement on Coleman mentioned.

Speaking after the listening to, Love, who nonetheless faces extradition to america if he travels outdoor the United Kingdom, mentioned: “This case is necessary to me, but it surely has vital ramifications for everybody. The use of robust data safety – in different phrases cryptography – must now not be a reason why to deprive other people of their non-public knowledge.

“I would be happy if a side effect of this action is that the NCA recognises that it cannot do nothing indefinitely. At some point I would like to be able to travel internationally and get on with the rest of my life.”

The pass judgement on reserved a choice till 19 February at Westminster Magistrates’ Court.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here