Johnson & Johnson Hit With $29 Million Verdict in Case Over Talc and Asbestos

0
9
Johnson & Johnson Hit With $29 Million Verdict in Case Over Talc and Asbestos

Johnson & Johnson Hit With $29 Million Verdict in Case Over Talc and Asbestos

Johnson & Johnson’s stocks dipped on Thursday after a jury in California ordered the corporate to pay greater than $29 million to a girl who claimed that asbestos in its talc-based powder merchandise had brought about her most cancers.

In rendering its verdict in Alameda County Superior Court on Wednesday, the jury discovered that Johnson & Johnson knew concerning the attainable dangers that its child powder used to be infected, however did not warn the lady, Teresa Leavitt.

Ms. Leavitt, a resident of San Leandro, gained a prognosis of mesothelioma, a most cancers of the liner of interior organs this is related to asbestos, in August 2017. Her attorney, Joseph D. Satterley, stated she had used Johnson & Johnson talc merchandise for greater than 30 years.

The jury awarded Ms. Leavitt $22 million for her ache and struggling, $five million to compensate her members of the family, just about $1.three million for her clinical prices and $1.2 million for her misplaced wages, Mr. Satterley stated.

Johnson & Johnson stated in a commentary that it used to be dissatisfied with the decision, bringing up “serious procedural and evidentiary errors in the proceeding,” and that it deliberate to enchantment. As in previous instances, which the corporate has fought with combined luck, it stated a long time of checking out confirmed that its child powder didn’t include asbestos or motive most cancers. Its stocks fell about 1 p.c in early-afternoon buying and selling.

More than 13,000 plaintiffs have sued Johnson & Johnson over what they are saying are cancers brought about by way of its talc merchandise. The New York Times reported remaining 12 months that the corporate had spent a long time looking to stay unfavourable details about the prospective possibility of asbestos contamination from achieving the general public.

Ms. Leavitt’s criticism claims that Johnson & Johnson has, for the reason that early 1900s, “possessed medical and scientific data that raised concerns regarding the presence of asbestos in talcum powder and that demonstrated the existence of health hazards to those exposed to asbestos-containing talcum powder products.”

Johnson & Johnson stated in a regulatory submitting remaining month that it had gained subpoenas from the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission for extra information about its talc merchandise.

In July, a jury in Missouri awarded $four.69 billion to 22 ladies who claimed that asbestos in Johnson & Johnson merchandise, together with its signature child powder, brought about them to increase ovarian most cancers. In December, the corporate misplaced a movement to opposite the decision. The corporate’s enchantment is these days pending.

Talc is used in greater than 2,000 merchandise, together with many attractiveness and personal-care merchandise, in keeping with govt information. The Food and Drug Administration warned this month that it had discovered asbestos in cosmetics offered by way of Claire’s, a store aimed toward youngsters. The corporate stated it stopped promoting all talc-based merchandise, together with the ones cited by way of the company, and deliberate to ruin its present stock. It additionally stated it had stopped making talc-based cosmetics remaining 12 months.

On Tuesday, the House Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy heard testimony about attainable asbestos contamination of talc-based own care merchandise. An epidemiologist from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle testified on the listening to that talcum powder considerably will increase the chance of most cancers.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here